Skip to content Skip to footer

Your domain: Microbial biotechnology


Microbial biotechnology and DBTL cycle

The microbial biotechnology domain is a very broad field that encompasses the application of microorganisms to the development of useful products and processes. As such, there are a very wide variety of experimental tools, approaches, and ultimately data, that arise in this field. A convenient representation of microbial biotechnology for organisational purposes is the stages of the engineering life cycle drawn from the related field of synthetic biology.

The Design-Build-Test-Learn (DBTL) cycle represents experimental design and analysis steps in synthetic biology. Current data management best practices and guidelines that should be applied throughout the DBTL cycle will be described and discussed here.


The design for a system in microbial biotechnology essentially involves two, interrelated exercises: (i) Identification of the biological entities/hosts that will be used to develop the product in question (ii) Identification of the genetic modifications/circuitry/constructs necessary to modify the host if appropriate. The design stage may also include optional approaches: (iii) Metabolic engineering of biosynthetic pathways (iv) Using mathematical modelling to aid the design of the system. Data management best practices and guidelines should be applied for each exercise and approach.

The components of the design stage could be summarised as below.


The build stage in the microbial biotechnology and/or synthetic biology life cycle is about building of the microbial systems and involves the application of any number of a range of experimental techniques. In this stage the synthetic parts are assembled and transformed into the biological host.

The main aspects of the build stage are:

  • methods, protocols and procedures used to build the modified organism.


The test stage of a biotechnological study is the most variable in terms of the types of data produced. This stage is mostly about:

  • testing the outcome or output variables and analyse the modified organism.
  • Characterising the synthetic parts using experimental data.


The learning stage consists in interpreting the obtained results, share the acquired knowledge and reuse it in combination with other existing data to improve the creation of the modified organism.

  • Publish and share data and results.
  • Reuse existing data and combine it with new data.
  • Feed data back into model(s) to inform the next iteration.

Here, we adopt the stages of design, build and test, and their components or aspects, to categorise the various approaches available for the management of data in microbial biotechnology.

Data management challenges

Ultimately, the ideal scenario is that data is captured in a standard format and then uploaded to a repository to ensure that it is Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR). However, for the biotechnology field, data standards are still under development or missing completely and there are still gaps in database provision for some data types.

Due to the interdisciplinary nature of the field, data arising from studies in microbial biotechnology relate to both computational studies, such as modelling and simulation, and the results of wet-lab based studies used for the construction and experimental characterisation of microbial systems. Given the breadth, scope and rapid development of the field of microbial biotechnology, this guide is by no means exhaustive.

This guide is by no means comprehensive. Please get in touch with further suggestions for relevant standards and data sharing tools that can make it more complete. Sites such as FAIRsharing can provide a wealth of information about standards that may be appropriate for a given data type and not mentioned in this brief guide.

Design: Biological hosts - metadata, ontologies and (meta)data publication


Metadata standards and ontologies to capture the taxonomic and phenotypic data about the biological hosts or organism are still evolving, therefore finding and using a correct standard to describe the biological host can be challenging.

It is recommended to publish and share information about biological hosts in dedicated public data repositories and databases.


  • The recording of taxonomic and genetic data must be considered carefully as part of the design stage.
  • Metadata surrounding the host is essential, such as where it was isolated, growth conditions, recommended protocols, etc.
  • Genetic information relating to strains and any modifications needs to be kept track of as modifications are made. Note that capturing the metadata describing a genome sequence and its host is vitally important to facilitate further studies in comparative genomics and phenotypic analysis.
  • To choose what are the appropriate repositories for your (meta)data, you should consider what kind of information about the host you are going to share, since each type of information could be published in a different repository.
    • Species, taxonomy, strain.
    • Phenotypic information.
    • Genomic or nucleotide information.


Metadata schemas and ontologies

  • Current data standards to capture the taxonomic and phenotypic data are still evolving, with notable work on the Access to Biological Collection Data Schema (ABCD) and the activities of the Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG). The Darwin Core standard from the Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG) is an appropriate standard to provide metadata about the taxonomic properties of a particular microorganism.
  • The NCBI Taxonomyhomepage can also provide appropriate taxon IDs for recording taxonomic information.
  • Information about proposed standardised nomenclature for prokaryotes can be found at the List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN) 1.
  • Data standards for recording the information about where a microorganism was isolated from do exist and this topic is covered in other RDMkit pages such as the marine metagenomics domain. Information can also be found in a publication by Ten Hoopen and colleagues 2.
  • The Environment Ontology (EnvO) is also relevant here to describe environmental entities of all kinds, from microscopic to intergalactic scales.
  • A set of genetic nomenclature standards have been established by microbiologists and have been used for many years. These are still a useful way of communicating data about the genotype of a strain 3.
  • Minimal information standards have been established to specify this metadata, such as the MIGS standard 4.

(Meta)data publication and sharing

Design: Synthetic parts - existing data, metadata collection and publication


Appropriate and detailed description of the synthetic parts design is critical for reproducibility. It is important to consider how to record metadata at each point in the design process in a standard way, so that it can be reproducible.


  • Format of designs may vary depending on the application, whether this be at the sequence level or an entire system.
  • Consider existing management tools that can help visualise and modify genetic designs.
  • Think about how the information about characterisation of genetic constructs assist in the selection of parts and modelling designs.
  • At this stage, it may be desirable to assert which host the designed device is intended to express in and also the intended method of replication in the host - for example, cloned on a particular plasmid or integrated in the host chromosome.


Existing data

Tools for metadata collection

  • You can manage the design stage using genetic computer aided design tools, such as Benchling for example, where information can be shared within small teams. Benchling supports a number of different data standards including FASTA, GenBank and SBOL1.
    • Sometimes FASTA will be the most relevant format, for example when sending for DNA synthesis.
    • Formats like GenBank, DICOM-SB 7 or SBOL may be more applicable for instances where more information, such as functional annotation, would be useful to be shared.
    • SBOL 2.0 and higher allows more than just the genetics of a system to be captured and shared. Using SBOL allows interactions between components in the design to be specified, information about RNA and proteins can be included and the provenance of a design can also be captured. Experimental information relating to the test and build of a system can also be captured and shared.
  • SBOL data can be made using tools such as Benchling (SBOL1 only), SBOLDesigner 8 and ShortBOL to name but a few. A more comprehensive list of SBOL tools can be found on the Synthetic Biology Open Language (SBOL) website.
  • More generally, the Investigation/Study/Assay (ISA) model can be used in systems biology, life sciences, environmental and biomedical domains to structure research outputs. The ISA-Tab format provides a framework for capturing these data in CSV files.
  • Rightfield provides a mechanism for capturing metadata using easy to use spreadsheets.

(Meta)data publication and sharing

  • Once the design is complete, you can share this information via a repository such as:
  • Much information about its performance can be included, varying from experimental results such as fluorescence curves to predicted performance based on modelling.
  • It would be recommended to use standard figures that can be easily understood.
    • SBOL Visual is a good example of a graphical standard; it utilises standard shapes to represent different genetic parts which can help clarify a complex synthetic construct. SBOL Visual can be crafted using tools such as VisBOL.
  • Platforms such as FAIRDOM-SEEK, built on technologies such as ISA, support a large range of systems and synthetic biology projects. FAIRDOM-SEEK provides a web-based resource for sharing scientific research datasets, models or simulations, and processes. FAIRDOM-SEEK can be installed locally or FAIRDOMHub, a version of FAIRDOM-SEEK is available for general community use.

Design: Metabolomic pathways and enzymes - metadata, ontologies and (meta)data publication


Here we describe some of the available options to accurately represent and store information about the designs of metabolic pathways and functional information about assays.


  • Enzymes have specific data standards that should be considered when accessing and recording their data.


Metadata and ontologies

(Meta)data publication

  • Databases such as SBOLME 9 or SynBioHub can be used to share the data.
  • Metabolite information can also be submitted to, or referred to in, ChEBI.

Design: mathematical model - standards and (meta)data publication


What tools and standards need to be considered when building mathematical models to aid the design of genetic systems?

How can the models be shared via repositories and made available in a way that makes results reproducible?


  • A variety of standards and tools are available for model building.
  • It is important to associate the genetic design with its corresponding model.


Build: methods - documentation and (meta)data publication


The build stage in the microbial biotechnology and/or synthetic biology life cycle involves the application of any number of a range of experimental techniques and, since these techniques are so varied, the domain is therefore very difficult to standardise in terms of the data and metadata to be shared.

The current method of sharing information about the building of microbial systems is to write a detailed free text in the materials and methods section of a scientific paper.


  • Capturing the information about the build process involves collecting the information arising from DNA amplification, DNA preparation and purification, primer design, restriction enzyme analysis, gel electrophoresis and DNA sequencing to name but a few techniques.
  • If using a protein expression device, the intended vector for its replication in a given host will need to be named.
  • The cloning strategy used to assemble the protein expression device and the vector will also need to be specified and shared.
  • The information about how the “final system” was built is highly variable, depending on the DNA synthesis and/or assembly approach used. Consider ways to share this information.



  • To the authors’ knowledge, there are no proposed standards that exist that are able to capture this diverse set of data. Currently, from a pragmatic point of view, the best a data manager can do is to make sure data is captured in some form from the lab scientist and grouped together with as much metadata as possible.

    The metadata standards for a build exercise are still to be defined and so at the discretion of the data manager.

  • SBOL versions 2.0 and above provides a data standard that allows build data that has been grouped to be associated with design data for a part, device or system along with a minimal amount of metadata.
  • Similarly, research object bundles, and more recently Research Object Crate (RO-Crate), can be used to gather together build data and test data with information about the overall study.

(Meta)data publication and sharing

  • The design information about the vector DNA or RNA sequence should be shared via public databases such as ENA or Genbank.
  • Various DNA synthesis companies build DNA from a computer specification of the sequence and also a variety of experimental approaches for assembling DNA molecules. This information can be shared as free text attached to a design in SBOL format and uploaded to a repository that supports SBOL2 format and above such as SynBioHub.
  • Once grouped together in a free form the data can be archived along with the metadata, collecting the data together in an archived form using a file compression format. The combine archive format may also be useful.

Test: outcome tests - metadata standards and (meta)data publication


The test stage of a biotechnological study is the most variable in terms of the types of data produced. The types of experiments carried out to test a microbial system are highly dependent on the intended function of the system under construction. Some common approaches include at the simplest level, characterising the growth of an organism at various scales in different growth regimes and assaying the production of desired product.

The data arising from assays for product development is highly variable and beyond the scope of this short guide, however we propose some recommended resources.


  • What types of experiments, e.g. organism growth, organism characterisation, will you undertake to test your microbial system? What types of data result from those experiments? Will you combine multi-omics assays in your study?
    • Is there a reporting guideline for the type of you are generating?
    • Will you reuse existing testing protocols or generate and share your own protocols?
  • Since (meta)data repositories often require compliance to their metadata standards, ontologies and file formats, it is recommended to be aware of those requirements when describing the test stage.


Metadata standards

(Meta)data publication and sharing


  1. Parte, A. C., Sardà Carbasse, J., Meier-Kolthoff, J. P., Reimer, L. C. & Göker, M. List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN) moves to the DSMZ. International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology 70, 5607–5612 (2020).
  2. Ten Hoopen, P. et al. Marine microbial biodiversity, bioinformatics and biotechnology (M2B3) data reporting and service standards. Standards in genomic sciences 10, 20 (2015).
  3. Maloy, S. R. & Hughes, K. T. Strain Collections and Genetic Nomenclature. Methods in Enzymology 3–8 (2007) doi:10.1016/s0076-6879(06)21001-2.
  4. Field, D. et al. The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification. Nature biotechnology 26, 541–547 (2008).
  5. Tellechea-Luzardo, J. et al. Linking Engineered Cells to Their Digital Twins: A Version Control System for Strain Engineering. ACS synthetic biology 9, 536–545 (2020).
  6. Ham, T. S. et al. Design, implementation and practice of JBEI-ICE: an open source biological part registry platform and tools. Nucleic acids research 40, e141 (2012).
  7. Sainz De Murieta, I., Bultelle, M. & Kitney, R. I. Toward the First Data Acquisition Standard in Synthetic Biology. ACS synthetic biology 5, 817–826 (2016).
  8. Zhang, M., McLaughlin, J. A., Wipat, A. & Myers, C. J. SBOLDesigner 2: An Intuitive Tool for Structural Genetic Design. ACS synthetic biology 6, 1150–1160 (2017).
  9. Kuwahara, H. et al. SBOLme: a Repository of SBOL Parts for Metabolic Engineering. ACS synthetic biology 6, 732–736 (2017).
  10. Hecht, A., Filliben, J., Munro, S. A. & Salit, M. A minimum information standard for reproducing bench-scale bacterial cell growth and productivity. Communications biology 1, 219 (2018).
  11. Tipton, K. F. et al. Standards for Reporting Enzyme Data: The STRENDA Consortium: What it aims to do and why it should be helpful. Perspectives in Science 1, 131–137 (2014).
  12. Spidlen, J. et al. Data File Standard for Flow Cytometry, Version FCS 3.2. Cytometry. Part A: the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology 99, 100–102 (2021).
  13. Sarkans, U. et al. The BioStudies database—one stop shop for all data supporting a life sciences study. Nucleic Acids Research D1266–D1270 (2018) doi:10.1093/nar/gkx965.

More information

Skip tool table
Tool or resource Description Related pages Registry
Access to Biological Collection Data Schema (ABCD) A standard schema for primary biodiversity data
Addgene A searchable repository with a focus on plasmids Tool info Standards/Databases
ArrayExpress A repository of array based genomics data Single-cell sequencing Data publication Tool info Standards/Databases Training
ATCC Biological materials resource including cell-lines, strains and genomics tools Tool info
BacDive A searchable database for bacteria specific information Tool info Training
Bacillus Genetic Stock Center (BGSC) A repository specific to Bacillus strains
Benchling R&D Platform for Life Sciences
Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG) Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG), historically the Taxonomic Databases Working Group, work to develop biodiversity information standards
BioModels A repository of mathematical models for application in biological sciences Data publication Tool info Standards/Databases Training
BioStudies A database hosting datasets from biological studies. Useful for storing or accessing data that is not compliant for mainstream repositories. Plant sciences Single-cell sequencing Data publication Tool info Standards/Databases Training
BRENDA Database of enzyme and enzyme-ligand information, across all taxonomic groups, manually extracted from primary literature and extended by text mining procedures Tool info Standards/Databases Training
CellRepo A version management tool for modifying strains
Cellular Microscopy Phenotype Ontology (CMPO) An ontology for expressing cellular (or multi-cellular) terms with applications in microscopy Training
ChEBI Dictionary of molecular entities focused on 'small' chemical compounds Tool info Standards/Databases Training
COmputational Modeling in BIology NEtwork (COMBINE) An initiative to bring together various formats and standard for computational models in biology
DNA Data Bank of Japan (DDBJ) A database of DNA sequences Tool info
European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) A record of sequence information scaling from raw sequcning reads to assemblies and functional annotation Galaxy Plant Genomics Single-cell sequencing Data brokering Data publication Project data managemen... Tool info Standards/Databases Training
FAIRDOM-SEEK A data Management Platform for organising, sharing and publishing research datasets, models, protocols, samples, publications and other research outcomes. NeLS Plant Phenomics Plant sciences Documentation and meta... Data storage Tool info
FAIRDOMHub Data, model and SOPs management for projects, from preliminary data to publication, support for running SBML models, etc. (public SEEK instance) NeLS Plant Genomics Plant Phenomics Plant sciences Documentation and meta... Standards/Databases Training
FAIRsharing A curated, informative and educational resource on data and metadata standards, inter-related to databases and data policies. FAIRtracks Health data Plant sciences Data provenance Data publication Existing data Machine actionability Documentation and meta... Standards/Databases Training
Freegenes Repository of IP-free synthetic biological parts
GenBank A database of genetic sequence information. GenBank may also refer to the data format used for storing information around genetic sequence data. Tool info Standards/Databases Training
Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) A repository of MIAME-compliant genomics data from arrays and high-throughput sequencing Single-cell sequencing Standards/Databases
HUPO Proteomics Standards Initiative The HUPO Proteomics Standards Initiative defines community standards for data representation in proteomics and interactomics to facilitate data comparison, exchange and verification. Proteomics
iGEM Parts Registry A collection of standard biological parts to which all entrants in the iGEM competition must submit their parts
Image Data Resource (IDR) A repository of image datasets from scientific publications OMERO Bioimaging data Tool info Standards/Databases
International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration The International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration (INSDC) is a long-standing foundational initiative that operates between DDBJ, EMBL-EBI and NCBI. INSDC covers the spectrum of data raw reads, through alignments and assemblies to functional annotation, enriched with contextual information relating to samples and experimental configurations. Galaxy Plant sciences Data publication
International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration (INSDC) A collaborative database of genetic sequence datasets from DDBJ, EMBL-EBI and NCBI Galaxy Plant sciences Data publication Tool info
International Society for the Advancement of Cytometry (ISAC) Data standards and formats for reporting flow cytometry data
International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (IUBMB) Resource for naming standards in biochemistry and molecular biology
IUPAC-IUBMB Joint Commission on Biochemical Nomenclature (JCBN) A collaborative resource from IUPAC and IUBMB for naming standards in biochemistry
JBEI-ICE A registry platform for biological parts
List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN) A database of prokaryote specific biodiversity information Tool info
Metabolome Exchange A repository of genomics data relating to the study of the metabolome
NCBI Taxonomy NCBI's taxonomy browser is a database of biodiversity information Standards/Databases
NCIMB Hosts information relating to strains, cultures and more A secure platform for developing and sharing reproducible methods. Standards/Databases
Research Object Crate (RO-Crate) RO-Crate is a lightweight approach to packaging research data with their metadata, using An RO-Crate is a structured archive of all the items that contributed to the research outcome, including their identifiers, provenance, relations and annotations. Galaxy Data provenance Standards/Databases
Rightfield RightField is an open-source tool for adding ontology term selection to Excel spreadsheets Plant sciences Identifiers Tool info
SBOL Visual A standard library of visual glyphs used to represent SBOL designs and interactions.
SBOLDesigner A CAD tool to create SBOL designs through the use of SBOL Visual glyphs.
ShortBOL A scripting language for creating Synthetic Biology Open Language (SBOL) in a more abstract way.
Standards for Reporting Enzyme Data (STRENDA) Resource of standards for reporting enzyme data
SynBioHub A searchable design repository for biological constructs Tool info Standards/Databases
Synthetic Biology Open Language (SBOL) An open standard for the representation of in silico biological designs and their place in the Design-Build-Test-Learn cycle of synthetic biology. Tool info
Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML) An open format for computational models of biological processes Tool info
The Environment Ontology (EnvO) An ontology for expressing environmental terms
VisBOL A JavaScript library for the visualisation of SBOL.